^ "Udumban, the next Paruthiveeran – Times of India".Archived from the original on 8 July 2022. ^ a b "A tighter script would have helped!".The film had a below average opening at the Chennai box office. A critic from Filmibeat praised the film for highlighting what needs to be changed about education while also praising the cinematography, editing, and music. A critic from Dinamalar praised several aspects of the film including the performance of the cast, the music, the lyrics, the cinematography, the editing, but criticised the storyline of the second half of the film.
#VETTAI PULI TAMIL MOVIE MOVIE#
However, it is commendable that director Balan attempted a social satire with his first movie with a valuable catch on our education system". A critic from Behindwoods wrote that "Although the movie has a good message to deliver, despite the fact that the message is increasingly being delivered repeatedly in recent times, slapdash production values bring the cause down. It addresses the topical issue about the challenge that parents go through to get their kids admitted to private schools". A critic from Sify said that "On the whole, the film is well-intentioned, humourous and criticizes the flaws of our education system and how anybody can start a school with prime focus on minting money in an entertaining manner. ‘Udumban’ delivers much more that what one expected".
A critic from The New Indian Express wrote that "But what is consistent and holds up the film to a large extent, is the line of humour and satire that runs throughout. Ultimately, it falls victim to the many flaws it wants to highlight". Siddharth Varma of The Times of India stated that "The storyline is a little confusing as it tries to incorporate too many things – sibling rivalry, the rich becoming richer, police corruption, the plight of farmers and, yes, the education system too. Malathi Rangarajan of The Hindu opined that "But isn't neat execution even more important to make the film worth your while? It is in this area that Udumban falls terribly short". "Nallarukkum Pollarukkum" sung by Mukesh."Paazhaai Pona Manam" sung by Shankar Mahadevan and Priya."Vaanukku Nilavu" sung by Shankar Mahadevan."Pallikoodam Muthal Mani" sung by Anuradha Sriram and Hariharan.
Rogger claimed that the monitor lizard was only present during the first photoshoot and appeared in the film through the use of graphics. Selvaraj sought to ban the film for violence against monitor lizards, which is an endangered species. The film was scheduled to release on 10 February, but ran into trouble as wildlife enthusiast P. The famous folk song "Ange Idi Muzhangudhu" took eight days to shoot instead of five because of the intervention by religious villagers. The film was shot in the interior villages of Madurai and Karaikudi, and was shot for three years because when it rained the land would get wet and not look authentic. Malayalam actress Radhika (who starred in Classmates) was cast opposite Rogger in the role of a researcher and Kerala model Nachathra as the second heroine, and they were rechristened as Sana and Keethika, respectively. A monitor lizard ( udumbu in Tamil) plays a prominent role in the film. The film was shot in the same locations where Paruthi Vooran lived. Rogger's character was based on Paruthi Vooran from Paruthi-Oor (previously depicted in Paruthiveeran), who actually existed according to the director.
0 kommentar(er)
